The GPL license (and other open source licenses) theoretically allow for something to be open-source and "free as in free speech", but not "free as in beer", however actual examples of such software are rare: when people hear "open source" they think "totally free" without allowing for further dichotomies.ĭoom comes pretty close however: only the code is made freely available (and to nitpick, you need to add you own video and sound systems/drivers) but not the actual data/artwork etc. you can have the source code, study it, improve it etc. Nuthin'" and the latter means "free as in speech" e.g. I can understand your confusion: most of the stuff released under the GPL is free and open-source, where the former actually means "free as in $0. The usual "free as in free beer" and "free as in free speech" dichotomy. The fact that the source code is free and something is licensed as open-source doesn't make it automatically free of charge.
I don't understand why the full version of DOOM is not available for download for free when it is open-source.
0 kommentar(er)
